A book review by Sharon Hill
This is a reprint from the Wednesday, May 1, 2013 edition of eSkeptic Magazine. It was interesting and not particularly surprising in the way the media plays on our fears and phobias.
“Such is the nature of the media with its focus on the unusual and the
sensational that it often paints a distorted picture of the world.”
So begins Bartholomew and Radford’s book The Martians Have Landed: A History of Media-driven Panics and Hoaxes.
After this book went to press, we saw additional media panics and hoaxes
in the false news spread in the hours before and during Superstorm Sandy that
hit New Jersey and New York City in October of 2012, such as the nurse who committed
suicide after being the victim of radio hosts calls to the Duchess of
Cambridge, Kate Middleton’s hospital ward, and the public outrage, fear and
conspiracy mongering that took place immediately after the Sandy Hook shooting.
All of these events have their antecedents in stories documented in The
Martians Have Landed.
The volume consists of 36 mostly short chapters written primarily by the
two main authors but with several guests. The guests’ contributions tend to be
slightly longer and more detailed, which makes for unevenness in the flow, but
this book is meant to be a panoply of examples. Some of the examples feel
familiar (even though I was not there), and readers can see how humans
repeatedly react to the same stimuli with different variables even decades
later.
Today, the Internet disperses rumor and gossip globally in hours. And
once the horse is out of the barn, the act of closing the door is difficult if
not impossible. And if it is, only a small sliver of the original audience
hears about it. And the myths are perpetuated.
Broken into sections corresponding to the source of the story—radio,
television, newspapers, the Internet, friend of a friend, and everywhere at
once—this collection contains fascinating stories that you might not believe could
happened…but they did. Not all the pieces are satisfying—some are too short or
just end abruptly—but collectively, it’s an enjoyable parade of illustrative
examples.
The first chapter hooked me. Did you know there was a major radio hoax
that terrified London in 1926 before the famous H.G. Wells “War of the
World” Martian invasion event? I didn’t. The best part was that American
reporters noted that the same kind of thing could not happen here in the U.S.
We wouldn’t fall for such mania! Yet, we did and still do. Over and over. Why?
We rely on our networks (the media, our friends and family) to inform us
about trouble. It’s not that everyone is just gullible. It’s more about
weighing what we see and hear and feel and making the decision we need to make
from what we have to work with. If that means thinking that wild animals are on
the loose in the city (Central Park Zoo escape hoax) or worrying that there is
a razor wielding slasher sneaking around (Ghost slasher of Taiwan) or being
paranoid that strangers are waiting around every corner to abduct our kids
(Stranger Danger and the Predator Next Door), we reveal what social animals we
are.
Problems arise when the information is not accurate or is a deliberate
concoction. In the case of radio and TV fictional dramas that (at least some
of) the audience thought was real, we see the failure of the disclaimers.
People miss them or don’t pay attention. Or, other factors overwhelm
assurances, such as a serious tone, historical context, or delivery from
trusted sources.
For example, in a chapter devoted to the Satanic Panic of the 1980s and
1990s that was sparked by a best selling book and then fueled by problematic
psychotherapy techniques, the authors note that claims of upwards of 50,000
victims of kidnapping and sacrifice went unchallenged. Yet, there was not a
single verified case! The tales drew from a societal fear of an evil secret
network where victims were subject to horrific scenes with trusted members of
the community doing unspeakable things. These stories grew in conjunction with
the expansion of television programming. With the explosion of talk shows,
hosts such as Geraldo Rivera garnered lots of viewers when the topic generated
a moral panic such as the lurid tales of Satanic ritual abuse.
My favorite chapter was about The Batmen on the Moon, an 1835 story that
marked the beginning of tabloid journalism. The hoax story included sciencey
bits that are so often compelling to readers to convince them of
trustworthiness. But the rival newspapers, attempting to fact check, couldn’t
confirm the story and worried that they were either missing out on a huge story
or, if they bit, they would look foolish for falling for a hoax. Today, with
the immediate transmission of news, rumor and gossip on the same social media
channels, it hardly matters. The push is for speed, not accuracy. Scoops, not
integrity.
The media does not anticipate nor feel very much responsibility for the
consequences of spreading less than true tales. We have seen the results in the
decline of vaccination rates due to unfounded fears and the spread of
conspiracy theories into the mainstream.
That’s why the topic of media-driven panics and hoaxes is very important
to comprehend. We are fooled. Often. And we should remember that media is a
business more so than a public service. Hyperinflation and sensationalism is
the M.O. It has been in the past and will be as far as I can see down the road,
and so The Martians Have Landed serves as both a history and
prophetic caution for future skepticism of the media.
No comments:
Post a Comment