Tuesday, July 31, 2018

Few US Adults Meet Physical Activity Guidelines for Health & Cancer Prevention

A new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) finds that only about 23% of US adults meet federal recommendations for aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity. This means that more than 3 out of 4 adults are missing out on profound health benefits from activity and putting themselves at increased risk for cancer, type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

AICR’s Third Expert Report found that getting enough physical activity lowers risk for colon, breast and endometrial cancers. Doctors and other health professionals say that “exercise is medicine” and many are even giving physical activity prescriptions to their patients to encourage them to take that advice seriously.

The CDC report looked at how many adults in every state meet the guidelines to achieve 150 minutes weekly of moderate activity and at least 2 days per week of muscle-strengthening activities. Nationally, the data shows that 22.9% meet the goals, but individual states vary from as few as 14.6% adults meeting guidelines to a high of 32.5%.

























State and community policy makers can use this information to understand how they might best work to improve their citizens’ physical activity, a key indicator of health. For example, leaders can develop and implement policies to create and support local infrastructure that encourages physical activity in their state. For example, when towns and cities have sidewalks and green spaces, it is easier for people to incorporate activity in their lives and, in turn, improves the residents’ health and quality of life. In rural areas, creating bike paths, trails and access to community recreation centers can boost those citizens’ activity.

“While a more physically demanding occupation can contribute to more activity, the researchers said that regardless of occupation, those who do leisure-time physical activity report better health than those who do not.”

In this study, researchers used data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) that gathered information from over 155,000 US adults aged 18-64 from 2010 to 2015. These adults had answered questions about basic health information, including physical activity at in-person interviews. For this analysis, researchers looked only at leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and not at activity they did at work. While a more physically demanding occupation can contribute to more activity, the researchers said that regardless of occupation, those who do leisure-time physical activity report better health than those who do not.

The report also found that nationally, men were more likely to meet guidelines (27.2%) than women (18.2%). In general the southeastern region of the US has lower levels of physical activity than the western states with the northeast and upper mid-west mixed.

How is your state doing compared to others? Do you have a place to walk, bike or otherwise be active?
Getting enough physical activity can be challenging, but AICR has some resources to help you get started and stick with it. Here are some tools for you to assess where you are now and to find ways to begin moving more:

Cancer Health Check – our new interactive tool to help you reduce your cancer risk

New American Plate Challenge – AICR’s tried and true program to help you reach your health goals and lower your risk of cancer

Physical Activity and Cancer Risk – resources  and ideas to move more!



Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Calling SCAM a Scam

BY HARRIET HALL, M.D.

As the world’s first professor of complementary medicine, Dr. Edzard Ernst set out to apply rigorous scientific standards of evidence to find out which alternative medicine treatments worked and which didn’t. After 25 years of research and a torrent of published studies, he had determined that most of them didn’t. A lot of people were unhappy about his conclusions, and Ernst was forced into early retirement. If his enemies were hoping to silence him, their plan backfired. He no longer has to worry about political correctness or unhappy employers. Retirement freed him to devote all his time to thinking about all he had learned and communicating his findings to the public. In a profusion of books, articles, blogs, and public talks, he has become ever more willing to speak out strongly and call a spade a spade.

Recently he teamed up with a medical ethicist, Kevin Smith, to write More Harm than Good: The Moral Maze of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. In it, they argued that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is unethical. Now he has written another book, SCAM: So-Called Alternative Medicine, showing that the very term alternative medicine is itself a scam. He explains,

Whatever it is, it is not an alternative:
  • if a therapy does not work, it cannot be an alternative to medicine;
  • if a therapy does work, it does not belong to alternative medicine but to medicine.
Ernst has been accused of doing nothing but debunking SCAM. Not true. He lists 20 CAM interventions that are backed by positive and sound evidence, and he rates most of these as “probably more effective” than conventional options. […]



Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Ask the Ageless Lifter: How Often Should I strength Train?

 Confused about training frequency for older lifters? You’re not alone. Here’s straight talk on effective programming from an elite. by Charles Staley (from BodyBuliding.com)
Q: I've read articles that say you should reduce the number of workouts per week as you get older, due to reduced recovery ability. But I've also read the exact opposite. What gives?

I love this question and have addressed it with clients many, many times over the years. The answer is a bit involved, but stay with me here, because this is an important subject. So first, before we discuss optimal training frequency for recovery purposes, let's first make sure we're all on the same page when it comes to the definition of the word "recovery." Recovery is assessed not based on how you feel, but rather, on how you perform.

According to Mike Israetel, Ph.D., a professor and coach at Renaissance Periodization, recovery is defined as "a return to expected performance." So, to put this in real-world terms, assuming you're training regularly, if you can normally crank out 10-11 pull-ups, but on today's workout, you can only manage 7, you're under-recovered—or at least the involved muscles are under-recovered.

Now as a quick aside, here's why I specified "assuming you're training regularly:" Poor performance can also be caused by under-training. For example, if you can normally do 10 pull-ups, but you can only do five after you stopped training for eight weeks, your recovery is fine, you're just detrained. With that distinction in mind, the next step is to appreciate that while age affects recovery rates, so do a lot of other things, including:


1). Muscle mass: Hard-training people with more muscle take longer to recover than less muscular people.

2), Strength levels: Stronger people do more damage to themselves during workouts than weaker people do. I wrote about this in my article "Why Full-Body Workouts Make You Stronger," saying, "When Layne Norton deadlifts 500 pounds for 10 reps, it takes a far greater toll and necessitates more recovery time than when you (please don't take this personally) deadlift 185 for 10."


3). Training intensity: For anyone, hard workouts require more recovery than most efforts. When lifters try to cheat this, they end up as an injury waiting to happen.

4). Height: Taller people move weights over greater distances on everything from squats to bench press,  and therefore need slightly more recovery time than shorter people.

5). Gender: Women generally recover faster than men, possibly for physiological reasons, but also possibly because of different training styles.
   

6). Hormonal status: People with relatively low levels of androgens need more recovery time than people with higher levels.
  

7). Programming: You'll recover faster while on a sound training program than you will from a suboptimal program.                   
  

8). Sleep quality: People with good "sleep hygiene" recover faster than those who don't.
  

9). Energy status: You'll recover better when on a hypercaloric diet, and worse on a hypocaloric diet.The quantity of your calories isn’t the only aspect that matters, You can eat all the calories you like, but if they’re bereft of nutrients, the only thing you’re going to build is the size of your midsection (& your caboose..).
   
10). Stress: People dealing with significant financial or interpersonal stressors need more recovery time than those who have more manageable stress levels.

That may seem like a lot of variables stacked up against you. But it's actually entirely possible, depending on the variables just listed, that a 60-year-old man could successfully recover from five sessions a week better than a much younger guy could recover from three workouts a week.

Here's what I mean: Yes, if you're of a "certain age," sure, that's an extenuating factor when it comes to your overall recovery ability. However, if you're training smart, sleeping well, eating enough, and managing stress successfully, you'll recovery as well as if not better than a lot of much younger guys. On the other hand, if you're conspicuously strong and muscular, and if you train hard, your workouts will create a lot of tissue damage, which will lengthen your recovery times. That's a sign of strength, not weakness!

So How Does This All Translate Into Programming? First off, it's worth noting that I've seen great results with men and women of all ages using three full-body sessions a week, like in my 
Total-Body Strong system on Bodybuilding.com All Access. If you stick with that approach, alternating heavier strength-focused phasesand higher-rep muscle-focused phases, and alternating exercises every four weeks or so, you can keep progressing for a long, long time.

However, there are other subtleties worth mentioning. For one, most people can recover faster from upper-body training than they can from lower-body training. After all, lower-body muscles are bigger and stronger, and therefore likely to incur greater damage during your workouts.

Therefore, as a general rule, train your biggest/strongest muscles the least frequently, and your smallest/weakest muscles most frequently. Here's one way you can approach this:

Monday: Lower body
Tuesday: Upper body (chest and back, no direct arm training)
Wednesday: Off
Thursday: Lower body
Friday: Upper body (chest and back, no direct arm training)
Saturday: Off
Sunday: Direct arm training

With this arrangement, your lower body is trained twice a week, and the big/strong upper-body muscles (mostly chest and back) are also trained twice. During these upper-body sessions, your arms are receiving indirect training stimulus. Then on Sunday, you train your arms directly. This way, your arms (the smallest, weakest muscles) are in essence being trained three times a week, while everything else is trained twice a week.

That approach, combined with a 
reasonable approach to cardiovascular training, should allow most lifters to recover adequately and keep performance high in the gym. However, recovery is a highly personalized process. Sure, age is a factor, but only one factor of many, and probably not even the most important one at that. Start with what you can do now, take notes as you recover, and keep coming back for more.



Sunday, July 22, 2018

Falling Into Infinity

BY MICHAEL SHERMER


In 1801 the English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge calculated the impact ratio of scientists to poets thusly: “the souls of 500 Sir Isaac Newtons would go to the making up of a Shakespeare or a Milton.” Defending his 1820 poem “Lamia,” Coleridge’s contemporary poet John Keats growled that Isaac Newton had “destroyed the poetry of the rainbow by reducing it to a prism,” lamenting that natural philosophy (science) will “unweave a rainbow.”

Does a scientific understanding of the world erase its emotional impact or spiritual power? Of course not. Science and spirituality are complementary, not conflicting. As the physicist Richard Feynman reflected in a 1981 BBC interview The Pleasure of Finding Things Out in recalling a conversation with an artist friend about appreciating a flower: ”the beauty that he sees is available to other people and to me too, I believe. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. The fact that the colors in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it is interesting; it means that insects can see the color. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower forms? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the science knowledge only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds.”

Spirituality is a way of being in the world, a sense of one’s place in the cosmos, a relationship to that which extends beyond ourselves. I call this sciencuality, a neologism that echoes the sensuality of discovery. “Our contemplations of the cosmos stir us,” the astronomer Carl Sagan waxed poetic in the opening scene of his documentary series Cosmos, one of the most spiritual expressions of science ever produced. “There’s a tingling in the spine, a catch in the voice, a faint sensation as if a distant memory of falling from a great height. We know we are approaching the grandest of mysteries.” […]



What is it like to be a Human?

BY COLIN MCGINN

Imagine an intelligent bat contemplating the mind-body problem, name of Tim Nigel.1 Nigel has noticed that humans have an auditory sense not possessed by bats (of his species): they can hear various pitches. This enables them to appreciate music (unlike Tim and his conspecifics) and also to have other types of auditory experience not available to bats. We can suppose that bats hear only a single pitch and only echoes of their own monotone shrieks, impressive though their sense of echolocation is. Thus Nigel concludes that he doesn’t know what it is like to be a human, at least so far as hearing is concerned. He has some inkling, to be sure, because he does have an auditory sense, but the range and variety of human hearing makes this sense alien to him—just as humans have an auditory sense that provides only partial insight into the auditory sense of bats. He thinks that if he could hear pitch variations in the manner of humans, then he would know (fully) what it is like to be human; but as things stand he cannot grasp the nature of human experience. This is a region of reality he cannot get his mind around (Nigel is a resolute metaphysical realist). He expresses his conclusion by saying that human experience is “subjective” and can only be grasped “from a particular point of view”, in contrast to “objective” things that can be grasped “from many points of view, i.e. from no specific point of view”.

Having come to this conclusion he notices an implication for the mind-body problem, namely that experiences like those of humans cannot be reduced to physical facts about the human body and brain. For such physical facts can be grasped from many points of view and don’t require that one shares the point of view of the organism having the experience. Tim can know what it is to be a human, i.e. to belong to the human biological species, but he can’t grasp what it is like to belong to the psychological type exemplified by humans, i.e. beings sensitive to pitch differences. But that means that it is not possible to analyze experiences as physical states, because the former are subjective and the latter objective. He has uncovered a feature of mental concepts that renders them incapable of analysis into physical concepts. Tim’s inability to know what it is like to be a human thus leads him to reject materialism.

The essential point of his reasoning is the contrast between concepts of experience and concepts of the physical world—the point, namely, that the former are accessible only to beings that share the experience in question while the latter are not dependent in this way. You can know what it is to be a member of the human species without yourself being of that species, but you can’t know what it is like to have human experience without having that kind of experience. And you can grasp the properties of a human brain without yourself having that kind of brain, but you can’t grasp the experiential properties with which these brain properties correlate without having those properties yourself. […]



Tuesday, July 17, 2018

For Optimal Brain & Nervous System Health, You Need Need To Exercise Your Leg Muscles

from Peak Fitness by Dr. Mercola

This is a little long, but worth the time to educate yourself. 

What You’ll Learn:

   
1). Physical exercise, especially strength training, is important for healthy brain and nervous system function. A number of studies have linked leg muscle strength in particular to various cognitive benefits.

   2). Research shows that whenever you’re unable to perform load-bearing exercises, you not only lose muscle mass, your body chemistry is impacted in such a way that your nervous system and brain also deteriorate.

   3). By not using your leg muscles, a gene called CDK5Rap1 is adversely impacted, and this gene plays an important role in mitochondrial health and function. This is yet another important reason for getting weight-bearing exercise.

   4). Weight-bearing against gravity itself is a crucial component of life that allows the human body and brain to function optimally. 

While exercise influences brain health in several ways, one key factor is related to its ability to boost brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which rejuvenates both muscle and brain tissue.

Exercise is primarily valued for its influence on physical health, strength and mobility, However, there’s ample evidence showing physical exercise, especially strength training, is just as important for healthy brain and nervous system function. A number of studies, which I’ll review below, have linked muscle strength, and leg strength in particular, to various cognitive benefits.

This fascinating link was again demonstrated in a recent study published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, which shows that neurological health is as dependent on signals from your large leg muscles as it is on signals from your brain to your muscles. In other words, it’s a two-way street, and neither “lane” is more important than the other. As noted by the authors:
“Both astronauts and patients affected by chronic movement-limiting pathologies face impairment in muscle and/or brain performance. Increased patient survival expectations and the expected longer stays in space by astronauts may result in prolonged motor deprivation and consequent pathological effects.
Severe movement limitation can influence not only the motor and metabolic systems but also the nervous system, altering neurogenesis and the interaction between motoneurons and muscle cells. Little information is yet available about the effect of prolonged muscle disuse on neural stem cells characteristics. Our in vitro study aims to fill this gap by focusing on the biological and molecular properties of neural stem cells (NSCs) … 
The overall results support the existence of a link between reduction of exercise and muscle disuse and metabolism in the brain and thus represent valuable new information that could clarify how circumstances such as the absence of load and the lack of movement that occurs in people with some neurological diseases, may affect the properties of NSCs and contribute to the negative manifestations of these conditions.”
The Importance of Leg Exercise for Brain and Nervous System Health: According to the press release, the finding “fundamentally alters brain and nervous system medicine — giving doctors new clues as to why patients with motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy and other neurological diseases often rapidly decline when their movement becomes limited.”

In other words, whenever you’re unable to perform load-bearing exercises, you not only lose muscle mass due to muscle atrophy, your body chemistry is impacted in such a way that your nervous system and brain also begin to deteriorate.
“The research shows that using the legs, particularly in weight-bearing exercise, sends signals to the brain that are vital for the production of healthy neural cells, essential for the brain and nervous system. Cutting back on exercise makes it difficult for the body to produce new nerve cells — some of the very building blocks that allow us to handle stress and adapt to challenge in our lives.”
Your Body Was Made for Weight Bearing: What’s more, by not using the leg muscles, two genes were adversely impacted. One of them, known as CDK5Rap1, plays an important role in mitochondrial health and function, which is yet another important reason for getting weight-bearing exercise.

As you may be aware by now, healthy, well-functioning mitochondria are crucial for optimal health, and mitochondrial dysfunction is a root cause of virtually all chronic disease, including neurodegeneration, as your brain requires the most energy of any organ — about 20 percent of the energy generated in your entire body.


As noted by lead author Dr. Raffaella Adami, “It is no accident that we are meant to be active: to walk, run, crouch to sit, and use our leg muscles to lift things. Neurological health is not a one-way street with the brain telling the muscles 'lift,' 'walk,' and so on." Previous research fully supports the notion that muscle use plays an enormously important role in brain health.

Indeed, weight-bearing against gravity itself is a crucial component of life that allows the human body and brain to function optimally. This has been clearly elucidated by Joan Vernikos, Ph.D., former director of NASA’s Life Sciences Division, in her book “Sitting Kills, Moving Heals”.

How Stronger Muscles Benefit Your Brain: Previous research has shown exercise is a key way to protect, maintain and improve your brain health and optimize your cognitive capacity. It’s even been shown to help fight dementia. There are a number of different mechanisms behind this body-brain link. One, perhaps key, factor is related to how exercise affects brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), which is found in both your muscles and your brain.

Exercise initially stimulates the production of a protein called FNDC5. This protein in turn triggers the production of BDNF, which is a remarkable brain and muscle rejuvenator. In your brain, BDNF helps preserve existing brain cells, activate brain stem cells to convert into new neurons (neurogenesis), and promote actual brain growth, especially in the hippocampus area; a region associated with memory.

In your neuromuscular system, BDNF protects your neuromotor, the most critical element in your muscle, from degradation. Without the neuromotor, your muscle is like an engine without ignition. Neuromotor degradation is part of the process that explains age-related muscle atrophy.


Yet another mechanism at play here relates to a substance called β-hydroxybutyrate, which your liver produces when your metabolism is optimized to burn fat as a primary fuel. When your blood sugar level declines, β-hydroxybutyrate serves as an alternative source of energy. β-hydroxybutyrate is also a histone deacetylase inhibitor that limits the production of BDNF.

So, your body appears to be designed to improve BDNF production via a number of different pathways in response to physical exertion, and BDNF’s cross-connection between your muscles and your brain helps explain why a physical workout can have such a beneficial impact on both muscle and brain tissue. It, quite literally, helps prevent and even reverse brain decay as much as it prevents and reverses age-related muscle decay. 

Exercise also helps protect and improve your brain function by improving and increasing blood flow (oxygenation) to your brain, increasing production of nerve-protecting compounds, reducing damaging plaques in your brain, and altering the way these damaging proteins reside inside your brain, which appears to slow the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

Exercise initially stimulates the production of a protein called FNDC5. This protein in turn triggers the production of BDNF, which is a remarkable brain and muscle rejuvenator. In your brain, BDNF helps preserve existing brain cells,6 activate brain stem cells to convert into new neurons (neurogenesis), and promote actual brain growth, especially in the hippocampus area; a region associated with memory.

In your neuromuscular system, BDNF protects your neuromotor, the most critical element in your muscle, from degradation. Without the neuromotor, your muscle is like an engine without ignition. Neuromotor degradation is part of the process that explains age-related muscle atrophy.

Studies Demonstrating Muscle-Brain Link: Here’s a sampling of studies demonstrating this fascinating muscle-brain link:
  
  1). In a 2011 study, seniors who walked 30 to 45 minutes, three days per week for one year, increased the volume of their hippocampus by 2 percent. Typically, your hippocampus tends to shrink with age. The results prompted the authors to claim exercise is "one of the most promising nonpharmaceutical treatments to improve brain health."

   2). Research also shows exercise helps preserve gray and white matter in your frontal, temporal and parietal cortexes, which also helps prevent cognitive deterioration.
   3). A 2016 study in the journal Gerontology found that working your leg muscles helps maintain cognitive function as you get older. According to the authors, simply walking more could help maintain brain function well into old age. The study followed 324 female twins, aged 43 to 73, for a decade. Cognitive function such as learning and memory was tested at the outset and at the conclusion of the study.
   Interestingly, leg strength was found to be a better predictor for brain health than any other lifestyle factor they reviewed. Consistently, the twin with the greatest leg strength maintained higher cognitive functioning over time compared to her weaker twin. The stronger of the pair also experienced fewer age-related brain changes over time.

   4). A Georgia Tech study found that 20 minutes of strength training enhanced long-term memory by about 10 percent. In this experiment, 46 volunteers were randomly assigned to one of two groups — one active and one passive. Initially, all of the participants viewed a series of 90 images. Afterward, they were asked to recall as many images as they could.

The active group was then told to do 50 leg extensions at personal maximum effort using a resistance exercise machine. The passive participants were asked to let the machine move their leg, without exerting any personal effort. Two days later the participants returned to the lab, where they were shown the 90 original photos plus 90 new ones.
Interestingly, those in the active group had markedly improved image recall even though two days had passed since the exercise. The passive control group recalled about 50 percent of the original photos, whereas the active group remembered about 60 percent. Project leader Lisa Weinberg commented on the results saying, “Our study indicates that people don’t have to dedicate large amounts of time to give their brain a boost.”
   5). Other research published in 2016 also found a link between exercise and improved long-term memory retention. Here they found that exercising four hours after learning something new helps you retain what you’ve just learned long-term. Curiously, this effect was not found when the exercise was done immediately after learning.
Why this four-hour delay boosted memory retention is still unclear, but it appears to have something to do with the release of catecholamines, naturally occurring chemicals in your body known to improve memory consolidation. These include dopamine and norepinephrine. One way to boost these catecholamines is through exercise, and delayed exercise appears to be part of the equation.
A number of other studies have also investigated the impact of exercise on brain performance and IQ in students and employees.
Research highlights include the finding that 40 minutes of daily exercise increased IQ by an average of nearly 4 points among elementary school students; among sixth-graders, the fittest students scored 30 percent higher than average students, and the less fit students scored 20 percent lower; among older students, those who play vigorous sports have a 20 percent improvement in math, science, English and social studies; students who exercised before class improved test scores 17 percent, and those who worked out for 40 minutes improved an entire letter grade.
Employees who exercise regularly are also 15 percent more efficient than those who do not, which means a fit employee needs to work only 42.5 hours in a week to do the same work as an average employee does in 50.

The Many Mechanisms by Which Exercise Boosts Brain Health: I’ve already discussed how BDNF links muscle strength and brain rejuvenation, but exercise also influences a number of other biochemical pathways that end up affecting your cognitive function and health, including the following:

Normalizing insulin and preventing insulin resistance: Exercise is one of the most effective ways to normalize your insulin level and lower your risk of insulin resistance. This not only lowers your risk for diabetes but also helps protect your cognitive health, as diabetes is linked to a 65 percent increased risk of developing Alzheimer's. Insulin actually plays an important role in brain signaling, and when proper signaling of insulin in the brain is disrupted, dementia follows.
Improving blood flow and oxygenation to your brain: Your brain needs a significant supply of oxygen to function properly, which helps explain why what is good for your heart and cardiovascular system is also good for your brain. The increased blood flow that results from exercise allows your brain to almost immediately function better. As a result, you tend to feel more focused after a workout, which can improve your productivity.
Decreasing bone morphogenetic protein (BMP): BMP slows down the creation of new neurons, thereby reducing neurogenesis. If you have high levels of BMP, your brain gets increasingly sluggish. Exercise reduces the impact of BMP, thereby allowing adult stem cells to perform their vital functions of keeping your brain agile. In animal research, mice with access to running wheels reduced the BMP in their brains by half in a single week.
Boosting noggin: Exercise also results in a notable increase in another brain protein called noggin, a BMP antagonist. So, exercise not only reduces the detrimental effects of BMP, it simultaneously boosts the more beneficial noggin as well. This complex interplay between BMP and noggin appears to be a powerful factor that helps ensure the proliferation and youthfulness of neurons.
Lowering inflammation: Exercise lowers your levels of inflammatory cytokines associated with chronic inflammation and obesity, both of which can adversely impact your brain function.
Increasing mood-boosting neurotransmitters: Exercise also boosts natural feel good hormones and neurotransmitters associated with mood control, including endorphins, serotonin, dopamine, glutamate and GABA.
   A study by Princeton University revealed exercising creates excitable neurons along with new neurons designed to release the GABA neurotransmitter, which inhibits excessive neuronal firing, helping to induce a natural state of calm. The mood-boosting benefits of exercise occur both immediately after a workout and continue on in the long term when done regularly.

Metabolizing stress chemicals: Researchers have also teased out the mechanism by which exercise helps reduce stress and related depression — both of which are risk factors for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Well-trained muscles have higher levels of an enzyme that helps metabolize a stress chemical called kynurenine. The finding suggests that exercising your muscles helps rid your body of harmful stress chemicals.

There’s little doubt that — aside from poor diet — inactivity is a major driver of most of our current disease epidemics, starting with obesity, which now affects nearly 40 percent of adults, over 18 percent of teens and nearly 14 percent of children. In addition to a wide array of health problems, obesity is also a risk factor for Alzheimer’s, which is now the third leading cause of death, right behind heart disease and cancer.
Non-exercise movement along with regular workouts could go a long way toward improving these troubling statistics. Most people spend 10 hours or more sitting down each day, and sitting for more than eight hours a day is associated with a 90 percent increased risk of Type 2 diabetes, along with increased risks of heart disease, cancer and all-cause mortality. The answer is to move more, including during work hours.
One solution that can work for many is to get a standup desk. Simply bearing weight on your two legs produce a biochemical cascade that cuts your risk of insulin resistance and diabetes. Walking more is another key solution. Rather than opting for convenience, take every opportunity you can to walk (or bicycle) rather than drive. Park further away; take the stairs rather than the elevator and so on.
In addition to daily walking (I recommend aiming for 10,000 to 15,000 steps a day), consider doing some form of regimented exercise each day. It doesn’t have to take a lot of your time.


Thursday, July 05, 2018

You Feel Your Thoughts

(from The Empowerment Dynamic (TED) E-zine






You think your thoughts. Right? Nope. You feel your thoughts. Let us explain. A thought is a transient mental sentence you say to yourself inside your mind.  What follows is a story or impression about your thought.  The result is a feeling or sensation in your body that relates to the thought. In other words, your thoughts evoke feelings. This is why we say you feel your thoughts. The tricky part is that this sequence happens fast and is often unconscious and subtle.

It is important to understand how this internal system operates inside of you. This awareness will help you understand that your thoughts about life and the feelings they create do not happen to you.  Rather, they are created within you and by you. If you are not aware of how this mechanism works, you might mistakenly believe that outside or external circumstances are responsible for your feelings. You live in the feeling of your own thinking.

Here is an example of how this works: You start thinking that you need a new car. You begin noticing new cars that look better, with the shape, color and new gadgets that you want. In fact, they seem to be everywhere. As you imagine yourself in this new car, you feel excitement. Then you begin to notice how your current car doesn't shine quite as bright. It has some dings and scratches. The more you focus on how your current car doesn't match up to the car in your imagination, the more unhappy you become. It's not that your current car doesn't do the job it was meant to do and do it well. It's just no longer making you happy. Have you noticed that this entire scenario has taken place entirely inside your own mind?

No one in the outside world has changed the way you think and feel about your current car. And your car hasn't changed. All of this unhappiness was created by you. It has taken place inside your head because of how you are thinking about your car and what you don't have (a shiny new car).

We use the acronym FISBE to name how this internal thinking-feeling system works. The F stands for your thought or what you Focus on. The IS stands for the resulting Inner State--the feelings that comes from your thoughts. The BE represents the BEhaviors or actions you choose in response to your emotions.

Why does this matter?  It matters to encourage you to spend less time on thoughts, emotions and dramas that you cannot control, and instead observe your thoughts and resulting emotions that you can control.

It also matters because giving your power away to outside circumstances means you are at risk of slipping into drama with life events.  In the example above, you may feel victimized by your old car, viewing a new car as a rescuer hoping it will make you happy.

When you understand that your experience of life comes from your own mind, you are no longer at the mercy of outside events. You can know deep inside yourself that another thought is just around the corner and that one thought can change your entire perspective.

Just because you understand how the FISBE operates inside you, doesn't mean life will always be goodness and light. Problems will still happen and negative feelings will surface. But, now you can understand how your focus (your thoughts) evoke negative (or positive) feelings, and, you can choose to shift your focus and notice that your feelings change.

There's only one thing that really gets you stuck--your own thinking.  And, you can change it.

As the old adage goes, you can change your thinking and change your life. By shifting to what you do want (eventually, a new car), the thought of which evokes pleasant thoughts (rather than negative feelings for what you currently have), you can begin taking “baby steps” (e.g. saving more money; researching cars and prices).

Indeed, your thoughts ---and the resulting feelings--- can shift you from a victim to a creator.



Tuesday, July 03, 2018

The 10 Commandments of Fat Loss

Some of the most important things you can do to your body. 
That is, if your body is important to you.

The 10 Commandments of Fat Loss